Optimal precision dependence of low-energy Hamiltonian simulation

Unsolved ID op_25d9dee5435ea835 Last edited 25 September 2026
Edit

Problem

What is the tight precision dependence of worst-case query complexity for low-energy simulation in the regime (2)? Let \(A\in\mathbb{C}^{N\times N}\), \(\lVert A\rVert\leq1\), \(H=\lambda A^\dagger A\), and \(P_\Delta=\mathbf{1}_{[0,\Delta]}(H)\), where \(\lambda>0\) and \(0<\Delta\leq\lambda\). Assume an exact block encoding \((\langle0^m\rvert\otimes I_N)V_A(\lvert0^m\rangle\otimes I_N)=A\), with controlled and inverse calls. Count these queries; input-state preparation is excluded. For known \(t>0\) and \(0<\epsilon<1/2\), a unitary simulator \(W\) must satisfy (1) uniformly on the promised subspace:

\begin{equation} \sup_{\substack{\lVert\psi\rVert=1\\P_\Delta\lvert\psi\rangle=\lvert\psi\rangle}} \left\lVert W(\lvert0^a\rangle\lvert\psi\rangle) -\lvert0^a\rangle e^{-itH}\lvert\psi\rangle\right\rVert\leq\epsilon. \tag{1} \end{equation}

Here \(a\) counts workspace qubits. Consider asymptotic families with \(\epsilon\to0\) satisfying

\begin{equation} \epsilon=o(t\Delta),\qquad t\Delta=o\bigl(\log(1/\epsilon)\bigr),\qquad \log(1/\epsilon)=o(t\lambda). \tag{2} \end{equation}

Determine whether the known \(O(\sqrt{t\lambda\log(1/\epsilon)})\) upper bound has optimal precision dependence.

Source

Zlokapa and Somma explicitly leave the intermediate-regime precision gap open in Sections 1 and 7 [ZS24]. The error convention and nontrivial-regime restriction are made explicit here.

Progress

Reports do not certify correctness or automatically change the problem's status. Progress policy.

  • Lemma 1.2 and Section 2.2 give \(O(t\sqrt{\lambda\Gamma}+\sqrt{\lambda/\Gamma}\log(1/\epsilon))\) queries for \(\Delta\leq\Gamma\leq\lambda\). Choosing \(\Gamma=\log(1/\epsilon)/t\) gives the stated upper bound; polynomial tolerance \(O(\epsilon^2)\) suffices for (1) [ZS24].

  • Section 5.5 proves \(\Omega(\sqrt{t\lambda})\) on explicit nontrivial intermediate-regime families, without matching the precision factor [ZS24].

  • Reported progress: Issue #96.

Comment

This formulation fixes vector-norm error and excludes the identity-accurate regime \(t\Delta\leq\epsilon\). Factor access is essential. The cited lower bound is not asserted uniformly throughout (2).

References

[ZS24]
A. Zlokapa and R. D. Somma, “Hamiltonian simulation for low-energy states with optimal time dependence,” Quantum 8, 1449 (2024).DOIarXiv

Cite this problem

Please also cite the primary sources listed under References. Cite this page for the statement, status, and stable identifier.

BibTeX

@incollection{qiqcop_op_25d9dee5435ea835,
  title = {Optimal precision dependence of low-energy Hamiltonian simulation},
  booktitle = {Quantum Information and Quantum Computation Open Problem Zoo (QIQCOP Zoo)},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://qiqc-op.com/problem/op_25d9dee5435ea835/}},
  note = {Stable ID op_25d9dee5435ea835; status: Unsolved; accessed 2026-10-08}
}

Plain text

“Optimal precision dependence of low-energy Hamiltonian simulation,” Quantum Information and Quantum Computation Open Problem Zoo (QIQCOP Zoo), https://qiqc-op.com/problem/op_25d9dee5435ea835/, ID op_25d9dee5435ea835, accessed 2026-10-08.

Share this problem

Permanent link

Identifiers

op_25d9dee5435ea835
01M22P0HY0R1RBEABK7MZW488E